“The Queen has been pleased, on the occasion of the celebration of Her Majesty’s Birthday, to make……….. Dames Companion of the said Order: Ms Catherine Alice Healy………… For services to the rights of sex workers”. The thus honoured prostitute had founded the “New Zealand Prostitutes Collective”.
I ceased being a Monarchist when the present Monarch signed away her sovereignty (and therewith the democratic sovereignty of the people) by granting Crown prerogative powers to Ministers to sign the constitution-destroying European Treaties. The Queen had surrendered 800 years of constitutional freedom for the nation over which she ruled. There was, I reasoned, no point in a monarchy which would not even protest at the removal of its own sovereignty.
But latterly the descent into the depths of depravity and moral licentiousness has taken on unbelievable dimensions. The signing into law by the Queen (as Head of the Church of England) of legislation which destroyed marriage and allowed tiny children to be adopted by two men or two women (where “mummy” is a man and “daddy” is a woman!) The prosecution of those who wear a cross to work, the killing of 190,000 unborn babies a year, the arrest of those who question “transgenderism”, the UK Government funding of extreme anti semitism in Palestinian text books and the State “Health Service” drugging 3 to 6 year olds to suppress puberty so they could have the opportunity to “develop different sexual characteristics” – all carried out by “Her Majesty’s Government” in 21st century Britain.
The fish rots from the head and in the moral, political and social decadence which characterise the British nation today the Monarchy has taken a leading exemplary role in their personal lives and in their kowtowing to (and now full endorsement of) deviant political fashion.
In the Royal family divorce is an epidemic – the Queen’s sister, Prince Charles, Princess Ann, Prince Andrew. Prince Harry (he of the Nazi uniform and Las Vegas “strip billiards”, marriage to a divorcee with a divorced mother and serial non marital relationships and a history of sexually promiscuous film roles) says the Royal family is “modernising” – “We are not doing this for ourselves but for the greater good of the people” says Harry! The black American Bishop who co-officiated at the wedding ceremony is a supporter of gay marriage which the Church of England – headed by the Queen, the bridegroom’s grandmother, will not accept.
I somehow don’t think many will be convinced that this young man is the ideal prophet for “what is good for the people”, not least because when asked about the continuation of that royal status which gives him a microphone to the world he seems to disown it! To Newsweek – replying to the question if any of the royal family want the throne after the Queen dies – he said “I don’t think so.”
While not the embarrassment that his brother has proved to be, the heir to the throne, Prince William, is now a champion of “gay rights” (not just tolerance or acceptance of homosexuals). I wonder if he would like his wife to bear a child for hand over to a lesbian couple? After all his grandmother signed into law the Act which normalises such births and adoptions. Or is such alienated childbirth only for the lower classes to perform?
And this month will see the first “royal homosexual marriage” – of one bearing the once venerated title of “Lord Mountbatten”. He will be given away by his former wife with whom he has three children! And this man seems hopelessly confused about what he is doing: “It’s brilliant, but I never thought I’d marry a man,” he said to the Daily Mail. “Being completely truthful, it doesn’t sit comfortably with me that I am going out with a man. I’ve lived my whole life as a heterosexual. … in an ideal world, I would prefer to have a wife because that has always been the norm.” After a long married life made so impossible for his wife by his infidelities, the moral, sexual and social imbalance and indiscipline have produced a homosexual “marriage”- and an aristocratic stamp of approval for the aggression of the homosexual lobby.
If, 30 years ago, a film director had portrayed the madness of the world which we now inhabit it would have been seen as a dystopian hell, a lesson for a society which lets go of all sense of history, sexual normality, moral compass, social structure, democracy and family stability. And yet that hell is what this decadent political class, aided by a compliant, chaotic monarchy has brought about.
Unless the Royal family wishes to be no more than a soap opera – with all the superficial tinsel, immorality and lack of public respect such actors rightly enjoy – then the Monarchy must defend in word and deed the sovereignty of the people and the moral basis of the Church of which the Sovereign is head.
If princes can “campaign” for homosexuals then surely the Queen can take a stand against the destruction of the British constitution or against the honouring of prostitutes – but apparently not.
Either the Monarch must be worthy of the allegiance of her subjects and therefore fight for their identity, Christianity, nationhood, family structures and the moral wellbeing of children – or the monarchy must go.
“I have watched this famous island descending incontinently, fecklessly the stairway which leads to a dark gulf. It is a fine broad stairway at the beginning but after bit the carpet ends”
Winston Churchill
