John Ratcliffe the Head of all US Intelligence Agencies (there are 17 of them!) has confirmed that there was foreign interference in the 2020 US Presidential elections. He specifically emphasised the threat from China. https://www.theepochtimes.com/dni-john-ratcliffe-confirms-there-was-foreign-interference-in-november-elections-report_3623035.html
National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien, Secretary of State Michael Pompeo and Attorney General William Barr all issued warnings long before the election that China was covertly attempting to sway American politics and culture from state legislatures to Hollywood films and from college campuses to Disney theme parks.
William Evanina Director of National Intelligence(NCSC) warned in August:
“Ahead of the 2020 U.S. elections, foreign states will continue to use covert and overt influence measures in their attempts to sway U.S. voters’ preferences and perspectives, shift U.S. policies, increase discord in the United States, and undermine the American people’s confidence in our democratic process. They may also seek to compromise our election infrastructure for a range of possible purposes, such as interfering with the voting process, stealing sensitive data, or calling into question the validity of the election results.”
FOREIGN INTERVENTIONS IN US VOTING SYSTEMS
A Mandarin Chinese video of fake ballots made in China for the US elections was exposed in early December and reported by the “Gateway Pundit”. The ballots were for a number of US States including Florida and North Carolina. The video contains a phone call ordering ballots from China
A Chinese American expert on Communist Chinese infiltration of US political circles claims that the US presidential election was heavily influence by China. Gordon Chang described the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) infiltration of American “elite” circles as an “espionage emergency.”
““We know that the social media platforms have taken down a massive number of fake Chinese accounts,” Chang said. “Twitter in June alone took down 174,000 fake accounts, so we know that they were actively involved, and we have a number of indications that it was not to help the president.”
There was a time when the censoring mainstream US (and UK) media were exposing the problems of private sector voting systems companies. A CNN report from 2006 on the 2004 Venezuelan Presidential election EXPOSES the Chavez Venezuelan government funding of and 28% share in Smartmatic which then bought Sequoia a US voting systems company. The US Government did not review these moves. CNN reported exit polls showing Chavez losing but then overnight the percentages were reversed and he won! “Only explanation was the Smartmatic machines had been programmed that way” said a Venezuelan legislator. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6P-wwU8IdE
The majority of the Smartmatic workers were based in Venezuela!
VOTING IRREGULARITIES IN 6 SWING STATES
In recent days the Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Peter Navarro published a 36 report on election fraud, particularly in the 6 swing States. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/wh-adviser-navarro-releases-report-election-fraud-swing-victory-to-trump
“patterns of election irregularities … are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election, strategically game the election process in such a way as to … unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket.”
He itemises the evidence:
“….more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues
and classifies the evidence under 6 headings:
- outright voter fraud, (4 States)
- ballot mishandling, (5 States)
- contestable process fouls, (6 States)
- equal protection clause violations, (6 States)
- voting machine irregularities, (5 States)
- significant statistical anomalies. (5 States)
In an interview on 21st December, Navarro claimed he had “the receipts now” to prove that votes were illegally cast in the state, saying that 174,384 ballots were cast without proper voter identification; another 195,000 or so, he said, were the product of “inexplicable vote surges.”
NEW EVIDENCE OF FRAUD
A hand recount on Wednesday (18/12/20) confirmed that a Michigan county falsely reported on election night a win for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.
The recount in Antrim County found 9,759 votes for President Donald Trump, versus 5,959 for Biden. On Nov. 3, county officials said Biden received over 3,000 more votes than Trump. Two days later, they said Trump won by about 2,500 votes. A third change took place on Nov. 21, with Trump being certified the winner by nearly 4,000 votes and that is what a hand recount on Wednesday 18th December showed.
If election night counts can be shown to be so wrong in Michigan then what of the other 5 swing states where the overnight sudden appearance of Biden votes overwhelmed the daytime lead by Trump?
No wonder 46% of US voters including 17% of Democrats think there was fraud in the elections.
ADVANCE WARNINGS OF FRAUD NOT HEEDED
The above warnings of election fraud long before the election were not heeded. Indeed many introduced forms of mail in voting which were clearly open to fraud. (no specific reason needed for postal votes, no IDs etc)
When the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was presented in July with two election integrity bills he blocked them! One would have provided $775m to “bolster election security” including a physical paper trail of every ballot cast and the other would have obliged all candidates to notify the FBI of any foreign Government assistance offered.
The Bills were not even put to a vote.
GEORGIA AND DROP BOX VOTES
We have already showed in a recent post how there were inexplicable changes in votes counted in Pennsylvania and Georgia as election night progressed. The role of votes cast in drop boxes (unsupervised boxes on the side of the road) was significant and in Georgia the drop box vote went 70-30 to Biden while Ordinary mail in votes in Georgia went 50-50 (DickMorris.com). It is obviously easier to cast stolen/fabricated ballots filled in en masse and put in drop boxes.Drop boxes are by definition localised – and identifiable as coming from eg a blue or a red district – and are a prime target for fraud.
Facebook’s Zuckerberg funded ballot drop boxes. Indeed Zuckerberg poured $400 million into areas controlled by Democrats to fund local election offices – some say illegally under electoral law.
INTIMIDATION OF FRAUD WITNESSES
Perhaps the most obnoxious demonstration of vote manipulation is the attempt to stop cases going to court or stop election vote and count machinery being audited by experts.
A Wisconsin judge has said that the courts have been intimidated by the left and the mainstream media. Even prominent law firms have decided not to be become involved in upholding the law.
And it is extremely surprising that, despite clear precedence in constitutional law, even the Supreme Court has refused to hear well documented cases despite having a 6-3 balance in favour of “conservatives”.
In Georgia two whistleblowers have had their jobs as election officials terminated for making detailed accusations of fraud. So the reprisals have been as blatant as the frauds have been disgraceful.
One of the dismissed workers said in her affidavit and subsequent testimony to state lawmakers during a public hearing on the election that she found a batch of “pristine” ballots that were all marked exactly the same. She said approximately 98 percent of that batch were for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
“In my 20 years’ of experience of handling ballots,” she said, “I observed that the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device.”
If despite massive censorship of the exposure of electoral corruption and voter fraud 46% of Americans already believe that the US Presidential election was rigged I believe there is much more to come out and that percentage can only rise. And no President can be legitimate or secure if he is elected in a process regarded by virtually 50% of the electors as corrupt.
