Imagine a vote count where as one candidate’s vote tally rises the other candidate’s tally FALLS – systematically! Impossible of course in any fair election. But this happened in vital swing states in this Presidential election and it shows how fair votes can be easily turned by computer voting or computer counting of physical ballots into fraudulent votes. There is a remarkable similarity between vote rigging in the Philippines and what happened to President Trump. A Smartmatic executive who left the Phillippines ended up as Election Administrator in a Texas County which turned Democrat for the first time since 1964.
In Georgia between late afternoon on the 4th November to early evening on the 4th November the “New Trump votes” column had 6 minus figures out of 16 entries! Furthermore the “change” column showed remarkably that the net change at all six time points was a loss to Trump and the amount of that loss was virtually always a loss of approx 4,800 and twice, three or 4 times that figure.
In Pennsylvania between early morning of 5th November to early morning on the 6th the Trump vote column suffered vote loss at 11 out of 24 time points and the net change column had suspicious figures of about 6,000 and twice that figure. The Biden column had no minus figures!
This figure might seem familiar to you. For 6,000 was the number of votes switched from Biden to Trump in by the Dominion Voting System in Michigan – where it was corrected and Trump’s votes restored. It was never admitted anywhere else despite the same system being used in the critical swing States.
A good friend Sharyl Attkisson who hosts a US TV Show “Full Measure” on Sinclair Broadcasting (and whose books on US broadcasters’ bias and news manipulation I can recommend) has compiled a list of the cases of alleged fraud in many States at https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/11/what-youve-been-asking-for-a-fairly-complete-list-of-some-of-the-most-significant-claims-of-2020-election-miscounts-errors-or-fraud/
RIGGING MACHINES
The company which produced the software for Dominion Voting Systems is called SMARTMATIC, a company founded by the Venezuelan Marxist Hugh Chavez and by two allies who still own it. as Rudy Giuliani said:
“It was banned by the United States about a decade ago. It’s come back now as a subcontractor to other companies to sort of hide in the weeds.”
A whistleblower explained:
Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.
He made it clear that the system would have to be setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed vote.
Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the software and hardware that accomplished that result for President Chavez.
Another witness:
The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple audit to reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes. First, the system’s central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people.
In the PHILLIPPINES Smartmatic is accused of “pre-loading” counting machines with ballots even before the election, as the former Congressman Glenn Chong asserted:
the term pre-loaded is exactly the right term I would use right here in Manila. Pre-loaded votes. Pre-loaded ballots. Again, I would point this out to our audience look at these pieces of documents. They are signed. We have 70,000 voters. Exactly 4,140 ballots were already scanned by 140 voting machines days before the election. That’s over six and seven percent.”
He and others examined audit logs and found pre loading of votes occurred on 145 machines. Chong also saw the same pattern in the Phillippines as in the 5 critical US States where Trumps’ big lead was overturned. In the case of one Phillippine candidate 900,000 votes were wiped overnight!
And (as in the USA with the disappearing Dominion employees) leading Smartmatic executives left the Philippines.
One of them Heider Garcia (Venezuelan born) left for the USA where he turned up as Election Administrator in Tarrant County in Texas – which has just turned Democrat for the first time since 1964 after the installation of new voting machines!
WHERE DID THESE VOTES COME FROM IN PENNSYLVANIA?
Pennsylvania reported mailing out 1,823,148 ballots of which 1,462,302 were returned. Yet total mail in votes (see table below) number 2,589,242. Where did the extra 1,126,940 votes come from?
Pennsylvania Official votes 24/11/20 at 8pm
Candidate Election Mail provisional
D Trump 2,821,610 594,6455 49,323
Joseph Biden 1,408,564 1,994,597 52,847
Grand Total 4,230,174 2,589,242 102,170
As Freenations reported https://freenations.net/3381-2/ Pennsylvania allowed mail in ballots which arrived up to 3 days after polling despite their own State law prohibiting that. As Supreme Court Justice Alito asserted the law “unambiguously required that all mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day.” Furthermore the State Law (Act 77) provided that if this portion of the law was invalidated, that much of the rest of Act 77, including its liberalization of mail-in voting, would also be void.
So under their own law those 2.5m mail in votes, 77% of which went to Biden, should be totally rejected.
DEMOCRATS ACTING LIKE CROOKS
The first reaction of a crook, knowing that he is guilty, is to shout “prove it”. This is what the corporatist leftist media and the Democrat Party have done. Secondly much of the evidence is thrown away – like the signatures on mail in ballot envelopes which must tally with the ballot signature inside. In this case Pennsylvania Democrats also rushed through certification of the result before the Court ruled on voting fraud.
Nevertheless the State legislature still has to vote on the result and Pennsylvania Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough made the assessment that there was a strong case to answer as part of an opinion explaining her rationale for blocking Pennsylvania’s election certification.
“Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment,” McCullough wrote.
The Law should take its course but I don’t know enough about US Law to know whether the “rushed through to avoid the law” certification can be retrospectively quashed or whether the State legislature will reject the vote on the grounds of fraud when they come to cast their Electoral College vote.
But two things are clear. There has been fraud and the Democrats have sought to circumvent the judgement of the law on that fraud.
STATE LEGISLATURE VERSUS COURTS
In Pennsylvania the Courts and Appeals Court did not allow the Republicans to even present their case (so they will now go to the Supreme Court) But the State legislature committee which did hear evidence was shocked by witness testimony giving the details of fraudulent movements in vote tallies. http:// https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/audible-gasps-laughter-crowd-panel-pa-hearing-witness-says-vote-spikes-went-600000-biden-3200-trump-video/
ANOTHER COURT SUCCESS
A Nevada judge agreed to let the Trump campaign present its evidence that there was voting fraud and illegalities enough to reverse Joe Biden’s win. The judge set a Dec. 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions. What’s more, the campaign plans to present its evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots in Democratic Clark County, where Biden ballots outnumbered Trump ballots by 91,000 in unofficial results.
But its biggest claim was that the signatures on hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as required by law and they found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules.
NONE SO BLIND AS THOSE WHO PROFIT FROM NOT SEEING
Now it may be that not all allegations of fraud in the US Presidential election will be proved but to say there is not massive evidence that needs to come before the courts (which are prepared to examine the evidence) is blatant manipulation by US Democrats and purblind bigotry by the mass media on both sides of the Atlantic.
Democrats of all parties and in all countries want this massive internationally planned and executed fraud to be exposed otherwise democracy is dead – and anarchy will begin.
We can see who wants that chaos – the fascist and communist Left and their allies in the big corporations. Communists always saw “bourgeois democracy” as the enemy. Fascists and Nazis always rigged elections and bent the rule of law.
We know who our enemies are. They must suffer a massive defeat.
